Is OA Ripe for Money Laundering?

A new preprints operator offers a token, and our new reality seems to invite money laundering

An interesting bit of speculation about money laundering Ted Gioia made during a recent interview about AI and the music industry — a topic I covered yesterday — made me want to think through how that could affect scholarly publishing in an era of AI-generated articles, producer-pays transactions, predatory publishers, lax standards, and open science.

Money laundering involves taking funds earned through an illicit activity — selling drugs, illegal weapons, banned technology, etc. — and transacting them through a legitimate source you can still access, thereby laundering away the money’s dirty origin.

Could our current transactional environment provide a way for nefarious people to launder money?

Sound far-fetched? Then check out this extract from a recent Australian news article covering Wiley’s woes:

. . . the UK Research Integrity Office recently described the [research integrity] problem as vast: “These are organised crime rings that are committing large-scale fraud.”

The mills, principally operating from China, India, Iran, Russia, and other post-Soviet states, have even been planting stooges in editors’ chairs at certain journals and paying bribes to others to ensure fake papers are published.

Or this from coverage of a Research Watch investigation in Science:

At least tens of millions of dollars flow to the paper mill industry each year, estimates Matt Hodgkinson of the independent charity UK Research Integrity Office. . . . So cash-rich paper mills have evidently adopted a new tactic: bribing editors and planting their own agents on editorial boards to ensure publication of their manuscripts.

Where is all this money coming from? And why are nation-states known for sketchy activities the ones mainly involved?

It’s not like we don’t have blind spots that can be exploited. After all, OA enthusiasm gave a Russian PsyOps and phishing operation carte blanche for years as various administrators and advocates embraced Sci-Hub, only to find it was simply a front for hackers.

So if you still think tying scholarly publishing to money laundering seems patently ridiculous, hold that thought as you peruse this recent announcement about Preprints.io, a blockchain-based platform with its own coin, which you can buy:

Of course, even in the world of crypto, there are things that give exchanges pause, and the PRNT token is apparently one of them:

This post is for paying subscribers only

Already have an account? Sign in.

Subscribe to The Geyser

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe